xonPlus Logo

Breach Data API & Monitoring Comparison

xonPlus vs HIBP, SpyCloud, DeHashed, Enzoic, and Breachsense — honest, sourced comparisons with verified pricing, real trade-offs, and a plain answer to who should pick what. If a competitor is stronger somewhere, the page says so.

At a Glance

Six vendors, six decisions. Competitor facts verified July 2026; sources cited on each deep-dive page.

xonPlusHIBPSpyCloudDeHashedEnzoicBreachsense
Pricing modelFlat monthly, all plans publicPublic tiers; API is paid-onlySales-gated, no public pricingFreemium search; pay-as-you-go API creditsPer API call + per monitored accountFour tiers, pricing gated behind a demo
Entry price$5/mo API · $25/mo domain monitoring$4.39/mo API (10 req/min)Contact sales; MSSP program reported from $10,000/moNot published as monthly tiersFree to 2,000 calls, then per-call · $0.50/account monitoringNot published
Free tierFree keyless API, no signupFree personal search; no free APIFree exposure-check toolFreemium web search2,000 API calls / 10 monitored accountsFree scan tool; 7-day trial after demo
Stealer logsIncluded on every plan, incl. free searchesPro plans only, from $379/moCore focus (recaptured darknet data)Raw records where presentIncorporated into monitoringInfostealer monitoring on all plans
Data returnedExposure facts: breach, date, data categories, riskBreach presence per accountRecaptured raw data, incl. plaintext credentialsRaw breach recordsExposure details per accountLeaked credentials + ransomware dump search
White-label / multi-tenantIncluded on all partner tiers, from $99/moNot offeredPartner program, contact salesNot offeredPartner program; white-label not publishedMSP plans, pricing gated

SpyCloud MSSP entry price per third-party reporting; SpyCloud does not publish pricing. DeHashed blocks automated verification; its cells reflect public positioning. Breachsense facts from its public pricing page, which gates dollar amounts behind a demo.

What about Breachsense?

Breachsense is a credible dark-web monitoring vendor with infostealer coverage and API access on every plan. The main difference is transparency: its four tiers are priced behind a demo call, while every xonPlus plan is public with self-serve checkout, and white-label multi-tenant tooling is included on partner tiers from $99/mo. A full comparison page is coming; until then the matrix above reflects its public pricing page as of July 2026.

Common Questions

Which breach data API has a free tier?

XposedOrNot's community API is free and keyless with no signup. Enzoic offers 2,000 free API calls with a key. HIBP's API is paid-only from $4.39/mo, DeHashed sells API access as pay-as-you-go credits, and SpyCloud and Breachsense publish no free API tier.

Which breach monitoring vendors publish their pricing?

xonPlus and Have I Been Pwned publish full price lists. Enzoic publishes API per-call rates and per-account monitoring rates but gates dark web data and partner pricing. SpyCloud and Breachsense are fully sales-gated, and DeHashed uses credit-based pricing rather than published monthly tiers.

What is the difference between exposure facts and raw breach records?

Raw-record vendors like DeHashed and SpyCloud return the leaked data itself, which suits investigations but is hard for legal teams to approve. Exposure-facts vendors return what happened without the payload: which breach, when, and what data categories were involved. xonPlus returns exposure facts only and never stores or resells raw passwords.

Who includes stealer-log coverage without an upcharge?

xonPlus includes stealer-log exposure on every plan including free searches, and Breachsense includes infostealer monitoring on all plans. HIBP gates stealer logs behind Pro plans from $379/mo. SpyCloud's whole product centers on recaptured data but is sales-priced. Enzoic incorporates infostealer data into its monitoring.

All competitor facts verified July 2026 with sources cited on each page. Spot something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.